Cadillac CTS vs Chrysler 300M

SQL/DB Error -- [Table 'ylinc_dimensions.news' doesn't exist]

Cadillac CTS
Dimensions: in (mm)
Lenght: 191.3 (4859)
Width: 72.5 (1842)
Height: 58 (1473)
Chrysler 300M
Dimensions: in (mm)
Lenght: 197.8 (5024)
Width: 74.4 (1890)
Height: 56 (1422)
Compare Cadillac CTS vs Chrysler 300M (1:1)



The Cadillac CTS and Chrysler 300M are two midsize sedans that were produced by American automakers, each with its own distinct characteristics and appeal. Let's compare these two vehicles in terms of design, performance, features, and overall appeal.

In terms of design, the Cadillac CTS features a modern and bold exterior design characterized by Cadillac's signature angular lines and a prominent front grille. Inside, it typically offers a contemporary and comfortable cabin with high-quality materials and advanced infotainment systems. In contrast, the Chrysler 300M, though no longer in production, showcased a more classic and retro-inspired exterior design, reminiscent of American luxury cars from the past. Its interior often emphasized spaciousness and comfort, with a focus on providing a traditional American luxury experience.

Performance-wise, the Cadillac CTS typically offered a range of engine options, including V6 and V8 engines, delivering strong acceleration and responsive handling. It was known for its sportier and more dynamic driving character, especially in the high-performance CTS-V variant. The Chrysler 300M, on the other hand, was equipped with a V6 engine that offered a smooth and comfortable ride, prioritizing a relaxed driving experience over sportiness.

In terms of features and technology, both vehicles were equipped with various amenities tailored to their respective eras. The Cadillac CTS often offered advanced technology, enhancing safety and convenience, and keeping pace with modern luxury sedan expectations. The Chrysler 300M, during its production run in the early 2000s, featured contemporary technology for its time, including premium audio options and comfort features.